Preoperative assessment of proliferative activity and hormonal receptor status in carcinoma of the breast: A comparison of needle aspiration and needle-core biopsies to the surgical specimen

28Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The applicability and reliability of estimates of proliferative activity in breast carcinomas using fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and needle-core biopsies (NC) was evaluated in 98 breast carcinoma patients. The Ki-67, Estrogen receptor (ER), and progesteron receptor (PR) immunolabelling of FNA and NC was compared with that of the surgical specimen. A statistically significant consistency between labelling was found in the Ki-67-NC (κ = 0.474), ER-FNA (κ = 0.318), ER-NC (κ = 0.518), and PR-FNA (κ = 0.404) groups. The consistency in the Ki-67-FNA group was less significant (κ = 0.182), and there was no consistency in the PR-NC group (κ = 0.062). There was a positive correlation of Ki-67 labelling in FNA and NC biopsies (Spearman rank, ρ = 0.4; P= 0.0007), and also in ER labeling (Spearman rank ρ = 0.6; P = 0.0001). These results indicate that NC and FNA can be used for preoperative assessment of proliferative activity and hormonal status in the breast carcinoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Railo, M., Nordling, S., Krogerus, L., Sioris, T., & Von Smitten, K. (1996). Preoperative assessment of proliferative activity and hormonal receptor status in carcinoma of the breast: A comparison of needle aspiration and needle-core biopsies to the surgical specimen. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 15(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199609)15:3<205::AID-DC6>3.0.CO;2-F

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free