Regime Type and National Remembrance.

  • Lind J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Analysts have speculated that regime type has a powerful influence on how countries remember, and thus on the potential for international reconciliation. A well-established school of political science theory argues that authoritarian regimes, challenged for legitimacy and lacking a free marketplace of ideas to combat bad information, often purvey chauvinist myths about their past behavior. In democracies, on the other hand, leaders have electoral legitimacy, and a free marketplace of ideas can contest the spread of false information. In this paper, I deduce the "Scapegoating Authoritarians" hypothesis from this conventional wisdom. I support this view with evidence that only democracies have been willing and able to engage in self-reflective national debates about their past violence. Moreover, such debates can lead (as shown by the case of Germany) to conciliatory remembrance. In this paper I also deduce a competing hypothesis (the "Unrepentant Democracies"). According to this view, a free marketplace of ideas will not necessarily eradicate myths as efficiently as many scholars believe. A free marketplace will supply the ideas demanded by its consumers, who often eschew self-reflection and guilt in favor of a more self-centered, and sometimes chauvinistic, historical narrative. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lind, J. (2010). Regime Type and National Remembrance. Conference Papers -- International Studies Association, 1. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.net.ucf.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=59229684&site=ehost-live

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free