Relational aesthetics and feminist poetics

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Traditionally, aesthetics has mainly been taken to mean formalism, which has mainly been taken to mean a self-referential, self-enclosed art object that New Criticism analyzed and iconized and Roman Jakobson defined as the artistic function itself. Cultural Studies contested this formalist self-enclosure, reaffirming art's ties to history, society, politics. But in doing so it reduced art to an epiphenomenon, as political/ideological manifestation. This essay argues against this aesthetic divide of form against history, claiming instead that artworks enact the relation between them and other arenas of human experience. It further argues that the recognition of gender as a constitutive realm of art points to just such a relational aesthetic, of art as the interaction - from resistance to confirmation to transformation - among the variety of experiences and concerns that enter into art and that art negotiates. The essay draws on Bakhtinian and Derridean theory to trace such a feminist poetics. © 2010 Project MUSE®.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolosky, S. (2010, June). Relational aesthetics and feminist poetics. New Literary History. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2010.a408299

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free