Skip to content

Could the twin deficits jeopardize US hegemony?

by Jeffrey Frankel
Journal of Policy Modeling ()
Get full text at journal


The American twin deficits are back. One obvious cost is a possible hard landing. A less obvious possibility is that imperial overstretch could eventually cost the US its global hegemony. This paper addresses many challenges to the twin deficits view that have been offered: the Starve the Beast rationale for the budget deficit, the straw-man question of whether the budget and current account deficits are always twins, the wishful thinking that the US has an investment boom, the correct point that private saving is low as well as public saving, the claim of a global savings glut, the observation that global financial markets are big, the hope that valuation effects or unmeasured services as world banker will allow Americans to continue the exorbitant privilege of consuming at others' expense indefinitely, and the proposition that China will happily buy dollars indefinitely. When all novel viewpoints are considered, one is still left with the reality of an unsustainable path of high budget deficits, low national saving, and high current account deficits. © 2006 Society for Policy Modeling.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

19 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
53% Economics, Econometrics and Finance
42% Social Sciences
5% Business, Management and Accounting
by Academic Status
21% Professor > Associate Professor
16% Student > Ph. D. Student
16% Student > Master
by Country
5% India
5% Portugal
5% Australia

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in