Validation of Hoek-Brown failure criterion charts for rock slopes

15Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although stability charts suggested by Hoek and Bray on the basis of Mohr-Coulomb criterion are used for rock slopes, but complete and precise recognition is required for distinguishing cohesive strength and Mohr-Coulomb equivalent internal friction angle for rock mass. The paper by Lia et al. [6] is the only one that introduced rock slope charts according to Hoek-Brown failure criterion. In this paper, at first, this type of charts is introduced. Then, Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion charts [2] are compared and validated with Hoek-Brown failure criterion ones [6]. Next, Bishop method utilizing Slide software is compared with Hoek-Brown failure criterion stability charts. Average standard deviation (ASD), root mean square error (RMSE) and variance account for (VAF) were used for the comparison. According to the results, because of high distribution and very low correlation among the comparisons, Hoek-Brown failure criterion charts are not efficient. © 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nekouei, A. M., & Ahangari, K. (2013). Validation of Hoek-Brown failure criterion charts for rock slopes. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23(6), 805–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2013.10.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free