'Is That What We're Here about?': A Lawyer's Use of Impression Management in a Closing Argument at Trial

by P. Hobbs
Discourse & Society ()
Get full text at journal

Abstract

Although lawyers’ courtroom language has been the subject of sociolinguistic research, most of this research has focused on the questioning of witnesses; thus few studies have examined the processes by which lawyers’ interpretations of the evidence are presented to the jury. This article illustrates lawyers’ use of impression management in their opening statements and closing arguments to construct a shared identity with jurors, in order to persuade them to affiliate with the lawyer’s point of view. Through the analysis of a segment of a prosecutor’s rebuttal argument in a criminal trial, this article demonstrates how a Black attorney addressing a predominantly Black jury uses the stylistic and rhetorical dimensions of African American vernacular English (AAVE) to construct this shared identity.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

16 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
38% Social Sciences
 
25% Linguistics
 
25% Psychology
by Academic Status
 
44% Student > Ph. D. Student
 
25% Professor > Associate Professor
 
19% Student > Doctoral Student
by Country
 
13% United States

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in