Skip to content

Wh-questions used as challenges

by Irene Koshik
Discourse Studies ()
Get full text at journal

Abstract

This article uses a conversation analytic framework to describe a type of wh-question used to challenge a prior utterance, specifically to challenge the basis for or right to do an action done by the prior utterance. These wh-questions are able to do challenging because, rather than asking for new information, they are used to convey a strong epistemic stance of the questioner, a negative assertion. The utterances are designed as requests for an account for a prior claim or action, but by conveying a negative assertion, they suggest that there is no adequate account available and, thus, that there are no grounds for the prior claim or action. The use of these questions in institutional settings can display participants’ orientation to institutional goals, norms and roles, showing that institutional roles can thus be enacted, and goals accomplished, by means of practices of talk which are not, themselves, institutionally specific. KEY

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

41 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
59% Linguistics
 
27% Social Sciences
 
7% Psychology
by Academic Status
 
29% Student > Ph. D. Student
 
20% Student > Master
 
17% Professor > Associate Professor
by Country
 
2% Portugal
 
2% Germany
 
2% United Kingdom

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in