Skip to content

Antecedents and Consequences of Participative Budgeting: Evidence on the Effects of Asymmetrical Information

by Michael D Shields, S Mark Young
Journal of Management Accounting Research ()


A review of empirical studies on participative budgeting indicates that most have focused on its consequences (e.g., attitude, motivation, performance, satisfaction) rather than its antecedents. We suggest that the mixed results of participative budgeting research are due to incomplete models of the process. Further, we propose that researchers develop theories that tie particular antecedents of participative budgeting to specific consequences. Next, we develop a model that uses information asymmetry between local and central management as the antecedent condition and link it to: (1) participation of local managers in setting their budgets, (2) budget-based incentives and (3) firm-wide performance. Data to test these relationships were gathered from corporate controllers of the Standard and Poor's 500, and the relationships were tested using path analysis. Three of the four hypotheses were supported—the effects of information asymmetry on participative budgeting, participative budgeting on budget-based incentives and the effect of budget-based incentives on firm-wide performance. The fourth hypothesis-the effects of information asymmetry on budget-based incentives was only marginally supported. We also propose three other possible antecedents of participative budgeting that can be investigated: (1) a desire to positively influence individual attitudes, behavior and performance, (2) to reinforce a particular culture, and (3) to provide a mechanism tor organizational learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Management Accounting Research is the property of American Accounting Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

57 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
70% Business, Management and Accounting
14% Economics, Econometrics and Finance
9% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
19% Student > Ph. D. Student
16% Student > Master
14% Professor > Associate Professor
by Country
4% Brazil
2% Germany
2% France

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in