A blueprint for implementation of a structured portfolio in an internal medicine residency

30Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recommends the structured portfolio as a preferred assessment tool for assessing all six of its core physician competencies. However, compared with other evaluation measures, it may be one of the most resource-intensive for learners and evaluators. Given the time and effort needed to properly develop mentors, train evaluators, and persuade learners, facilitation of the learning environment supporting a portfolio may be the most important variable determining its success or failure. The authors review the components necessary to successfully build and maintain a robust portfolio learning environment in a graduate medical education setting. These include gaining staff acceptance, staging implementation, enhancing learner participation, training mentors, choosing paper versus electronic formats, and selecting assessment methods. Their blueprint for implementing a portfolio is informed by their five-year experience with a portfolio rollout in one internal medicine residency, from 2006 to 2011. © by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Donato, A. A., & George, D. L. (2012). A blueprint for implementation of a structured portfolio in an internal medicine residency. Academic Medicine, 87(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823f40a2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free