Skip to content

The challenges for quantitative photoacoustic imaging

by Bt Cox, Jg Laufer, Pc Beard
Proc. of SPIE, Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing ()
Get full text at journal


In recent years, some of the promised potential of biomedical photoacoustic imaging has begun to be realised. It has been used to produce good, three-dimensional, images of blood vasculature in mice and other small animals, and in human skin in vivo, to depths of several mm, while maintaining a spatial resolution of <100 mu m. Furthermore, photoacoustic imaging depends for contrast on the optical absorption distribution of the tissue under study, so, in the same way that the measurement of optical spectra has traditionally provided a means of determining the molecular constituents of an object, there is hope that multiwavelength photoacoustic imaging will provide a way to distinguish and quantify the component molecules of optically-scattering biological tissue (which may include exogeneous, targeted, chromophores). In simple situations with only a few significant absorbers and some prior knowledge of the geometry of the arrangement, this has been shown to be possible, but significant hurdles remain before the general problem can be solved. The general problem may be stated as follows: is it possible, in general, to take a set of photoacoustic images obtained at multiple optical wavelengths, and process them in a way that results in a set of quantitatively accurate images of the concentration distributions of the constituent chromophores of the imaged tissue? If such an 'inversion' procedure not specific to any particular situation and free of restrictive suppositions - were designed, then photoacoustic imaging would offer the possibility of high resolution 'molecular' imaging of optically scattering tissue: a very powerful technique that would find uses in many areas of the life sciences and in clinical practice. This paper describes the principal challenges that must be overcome for such a general procedure to be successful.

Cite this document (BETA)

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

79 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
43% Engineering
38% Physics and Astronomy
10% Mathematics
by Academic Status
38% Student > Ph. D. Student
23% Researcher
11% Student > Master
by Country
6% United Kingdom
5% United States
1% Germany

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in