Skip to content

A cognitive neuroscience framework for understanding causal reasoning and the law.

by Jonathan A. Fugelsang, Kevin N Dunbar
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences ()
Get full text at journal


Over the past couple of decades, there have been great developments in the fields of psychology and cognitive neuroscience that have allowed the advancement of our understanding of how people make judgements about causality in several domains. We provide a review of some of the contemporary psychological models of causal thinking that are directly relevant to legal reasoning. In addition, we cover some exciting new research using advanced neuroimaging techniques that have helped to uncover the underlying neural signatures of complex causal reasoning. Through the use of functional imaging, we provide a first-hand look at how the brain responds to evidence that is either consistent or inconsistent with one's beliefs and expectations. Based on the data covered in this review, we propose some ideas for how the effectiveness of causal reasoning, especially as it pertains to legal decision-making, may be facilitated.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

66 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
45% Psychology
17% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
11% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
24% Student > Ph. D. Student
23% Researcher
12% Professor > Associate Professor
by Country
5% Germany
5% United States
3% Poland

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in