Skip to content

Comparative characterization of polymethylsiloxane hydrogel and silylated fumed silica and silica gel

by V. M. Gun'ko, V. V. Turov, V. I. Zarko, E. V. Goncharuk, I. I. Gerashchenko, A. A. Turova, I. F. Mironyuk, R. Leboda, J. Skubiszewska-Zieba, W. Janusz show all authors
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science ()
Get full text at journal


Polymethylsiloxane (PMS) hydrogel (CPMS = 10 ?? wt %, soft paste-like hydrogel), diluted aqueous suspensions, and dried/wetted xerogel (powder) were studied in comparison with suspensions and dry powders of unmodified and silylated nanosilicas and silica gels using 1H NMR, thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC), quasielastic light scattering (QELS), rheometry, and adsorption methods. Nanosized primary PMS particles, which are softer and less dense than silica ones because of the presence of CH3 groups attached to each Si atom and residual silanols, form soft secondary particles (soft paste-like hydrogel) that can be completely decomposed to nanoparticles with sizes smaller than 10 nm on sonication of the aqueous suspensions. Despite the soft character of the secondary particles, the aqueous suspensions of PMS are characterized by a higher viscosity (at concentration CPMS = 3 - 5 ?? wt %) than the suspension of fumed silica at a higher concentration. Three types of structured water are observed in dry PMS xerogel (adsorbed water of 3 wt%). These structures, characterized by the chemical shift of the proton resonance at ??H ??? 1.7, 3.7, and 5 ppm, correspond to weakly associated but strongly bound water and to strongly associated but weakly or strongly bound waters, respectively. NMR cryoporometry and QELS results suggest that PMS is a mesoporous-macroporous material with the textural porosity caused by voids between primary particles forming aggregates and agglomerates of aggregates. PMS is characterized by a much smaller adsorption capacity with respect to proteins (gelatin, ovalbumin) than unmodified fumed silica A-300. ?? 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite this document (BETA)

Authors on Mendeley

Readership Statistics

9 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
44% Chemistry
22% Engineering
11% Environmental Science
by Academic Status
22% Student > Ph. D. Student
22% Professor > Associate Professor
22% Researcher
by Country
11% India

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in