Skip to content

Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy

by Stanislas Dehaene, Jean Pierre Changeux, Lionel Naccache, Jérôme Sackur, Claire Sergent
Trends in Cognitive Sciences ()
Get full text at journal


Of the many brain events evoked by a visual stimulus, which are specifically associated with conscious perception, and which merely reflect non-conscious processing? Several recent neuroimaging studies have contrasted conscious and non-conscious visual processing, but their results appear inconsistent. Some support a correlation of conscious perception with early occipital events, others with late parieto-frontal activity. Here we attempt to make sense of these dissenting results. On the basis of the global neuronal workspace hypothesis, we propose a taxonomy that distinguishes between vigilance and access to conscious report, as well as between subliminal, preconscious and conscious processing. We suggest that these distinctions map onto different neural mechanisms, and that conscious perception is systematically associated with surges of parieto-frontal activity causing top-down amplification. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

1342 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
58% Psychology
12% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
6% Medicine and Dentistry
by Academic Status
28% Student > Ph. D. Student
19% Researcher
18% Student > Master
by Country
3% United States
2% Germany
2% United Kingdom

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in