Effect of different cooking methods on the antioxidant activity of some vegetables from Pakistan

101Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The effects of different cooking methods (boiling, frying and microwave cooking) on the antioxidant activity of some selected vegetables (peas, carrot, spinach, cabbage, cauliflower, yellow turnip and white turnip) were assessed by measuring the total phenolic contents (TPC), reducing power and percentage inhibition in linoleic acid system. TPC (gallic acid equivalents g/100 g of dry weight) and reducing power of the methanolic extracts of raw-, microwaved-, boiled- and fried vegetables ranged 0.333-2.97, 0.52-2.68, 0.48-2.08, 1.00-2.02 and 0.391-2.24, 0.822-1.10, 0.547-1.16, 0.910-4.07, respectively. The level of inhibition of peroxidation ranged 71.4-89.0, 66.4-87.3, 73.2-89.2 and 77.4-91.3%, respectively. Antioxidant activity of the vegetables examined was appreciably affected because of varying cooking treatments. TPC of vegetables, generally, decreased by boiling, frying and microwave cooking. There was a significant (P < 0.05) increase in reducing power as a result of frying. However, boiling and microwave cooking did not affect reducing power. Inhibition of peroxidation increased by boiling and frying, whereas, in contrast it was decreased by microwave cooking. The results of the present investigation showed that all the cooking methods affected the antioxidant properties of the vegetables; however, microwave treatment exhibited more deleterious effects when compared with those of other treatments. Thus an appropriate method might be sought for the processing of such vegetables to retain their antioxidant components at maximum level. © 2007 Institute of Food Science and Technology Trust Fund.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sultana, B., Anwar, F., & Iqbal, S. (2008). Effect of different cooking methods on the antioxidant activity of some vegetables from Pakistan. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 43(3), 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01504.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free