Skip to content

Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception

by Robert Briscoe
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research ()
Get full text at journal


Neuropsychological findings used to motivate the “two visual systems” hypothesis have been taken to endanger a pair of widely accepted claims about spatial representation in visual experience. The first is the claim that visual experience represents 3-D space around the perceiver using an egocentric frame of reference. The second is the claim that there is a constitutive link between the spatial contents of visual experience and the perceiver’s bodily actions. In this paper, I carefully assess three main sources of evidence for the two visual systems hypothesis and argue that the best interpretation of the evidence is in fact consistent with both claims. I conclude with some brief remarks on the relation between visual consciousness and rational agency.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

98 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
26% Psychology
15% Computer Science
13% Philosophy
by Academic Status
35% Student > Ph. D. Student
16% Student > Master
14% Student > Bachelor
by Country
4% Germany
3% United States
2% United Kingdom

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in