Fighting maritime piracy under the European convention on human rights

26Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

On the basis of real examples of anti-piracy operations conducted in the Indian Ocean by European navies, the article examines the legal implications of such military actions and their judicial medium- and long-term consequences in the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights. The only existing authority directly addressing maritime piracy, although from the sole perspective of state jurisdiction, is the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Medvedyev and Others v. France. The Court's approach and conclusions in Medvedyev will be analysed in section 2. Section 3 will explore other important issues likely to be raised under the Convention by anti-piracy operations. Section 4 will consider the question of state responsibility, i.e., jurisdiction and attribution, in the context of anti-piracy operations carried out on the high seas or on the territory of third states. © EJIL 2011; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bodini, S. P. (2011). Fighting maritime piracy under the European convention on human rights. European Journal of International Law, 22(3), 829–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chr052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free