Skip to content

Five concepts of religion

by Linda Woodhead
International Review of Sociology ()
Get full text at journal


In the face of continuing debate about the adequacy and definition of the concept of ‘religion’, this paper argues that it is necessary for the social sciences to become more self-critical about their various – and changing – uses of the term. As this paper shows, three main uses are currently dominant: religion as belief/meaning, religion as identity, and religion as structured social relations. By contrast, some uses which were once important are currently recessive, including Marxist approaches to religion as ideology, and Parsonian conceptions of religion as norms and values. Some new uses are also emerging, including ‘material’ religion, religion as discourse, and religion as practice. Drawing these together, the paper proposes a taxonomy of five main major uses of the term. It reflects on their adequacy, and points out where there are still occlusions: above all with regard to ‘super-social’ or ‘meta-social’ relations with non-human or quasi-human beings, forces and powers.

Author-supplied keywords

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

39 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
56% Social Sciences
36% Arts and Humanities
3% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
by Academic Status
31% Student > Ph. D. Student
23% Student > Bachelor
18% Researcher
by Country
8% Germany
5% United Kingdom
3% South Africa

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in