A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies

139Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

One of the major problems of large scale, distributed and evolving ontologies is the potential introduction of inconsistencies. In this paper we survey four different approaches to handling inconsistency in DL-based ontologies: consistent ontology evolution, repairing inconsistencies, reasoning in the presence of inconsistencies and multi-version reasoning. We present a common formal basis for all of them, and use this common basis to compare these approaches. We discuss the different requirements for each of these methods, the conditions under which each of them is applicable, the knowledge requirements of the various methods, and the different usage scenarios to which they would apply. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haase, P., Van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., & Sure, Y. (2005). A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3729 LNCS, pp. 353–367). https://doi.org/10.1007/11574620_27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free