Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative

189Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Much of the research on notetaking has distinguished and compared its process and product functions. Conclusions are that the act of notetaking is beneficial independent of review (the process function), and that the review of notes is additionally beneficial (the product function). Although such research informs us that these activities are effective, it fails to explain how learners should take notes and how notes should be reviewed. A depth of processing framework that can lead to more functional implications is proposed for reassessing and for redirecting the investigation of notetaking and review. Essentially, the framework specifies that levels of notetaking and/or review should be manipulated and examined with regard to levels of learning outcomes. Presently, few studies conform to these guidelines, but those that do provide more specific instructional implications. This article concludes with an account of these implications and with guidelines for investigating depth of processing during notetaking and review. © 1985, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2001_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free