A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi

25Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper provides an OWL ontology for legal cases with an instantiation of the legal case Popov v. Hayashi. The ontology makes explicit the conceptual knowledge of the legal case domain, supports reasoning about the domain, and can be used to annotate the text of cases, which in turn can be used to populate the ontology. A populated ontology is a case base which can be used for information retrieval, information extraction, and case based reasoning. The ontology contains not only elements for indexing the case (e.g. the parties, jurisdiction, and date), but as well elements used to reason to a decision such as argument schemes and the components input to the schemes. We use the Protégé ontology editor and knowledge acquisition system, current guidelines for ontology development, and tools for visual and linguistic presentation of the ontology. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wyner, A., & Hoekstra, R. (2012). A legal case OWL ontology with an instantiation of Popov v. Hayashi. In Artificial Intelligence and Law (Vol. 20, pp. 83–107). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9119-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free