Abstract: Many authors have proposed categorizations for approaches to Knowledge Management; outstanding prospects including functionalist and interpretativist. In the first approach, knowledge is considered as a “static object” that exists in a number of ways and locations; in the second one, knowledge does not exist independently of human experience, social practice, of knowledge itself and its use, where it is shared by the social practices of communities, because it is “dynamic and active”. These articles constitute an extensive review on the subject, focused in reviewing, analyzing and presenting a study of the interpretativist perspective, and describe a maturity model for KM operational from it. [Copyright &y& Elsevier], Copyright of International Journal of Information Management is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may pr)
CITATION STYLE
M., E. S. (2012). Maturity model of Knowledge Management in the interpretativist perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 32(4), 365–371. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=77733580&lang=pt-br&site=ehost-live
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.