Modernization and dependency: Alternative perspectives in the study of latin American underdevelopment

1Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter contrasts the modernization and dependency perspectives. Since the main notions of modernization theory have been covered in some detail in earlier chapters, only those portions of the Valenzuelas’ discussion that elaborate on dependency theory are included here. The Valenzuelas enumerate the principal assumptions held by dependency thinkers and present some of the supporting evidence for the theory’s validity, drawing upon the Latin American experience. After evaluating the relative merits of the two perspectives, they conclude that dependency is the superior framework primarily because it is firmly grounded in historical reality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valenzuela, J. S., & Valenzuela, A. (2019). Modernization and dependency: Alternative perspectives in the study of latin American underdevelopment. In The Gap Between Rich and Poor: Contending Perspectives On The Political Economy of Development (pp. 105–118). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429311208-12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free