Skip to content

Quantifying the time course of visual object processing using ERPs: It's time to up the game

by Guillaume A. Rousselet, Cyril R. Pernet
Frontiers in Psychology ()
Get full text at journal


Hundreds of studies have investigated the early ERPs to faces and objects using scalp and intracranial recordings. The vast majority of these studies have used uncontrolled stimuli, inappropriate designs, peak measurements, poor figures, and poor inferential and descriptive group statistics. These problems, together with a tendency to discuss any effect p < 0.05 rather than to report effect sizes, have led to a research field very much qualitative in nature, despite its quantitative inspirations, and in which predictions do not go beyond condition A > condition B. Here we describe the main limitations of face and object ERP research and suggest alternative strategies to move forward. The problems plague intracranial and surface ERP studies, but also studies using more advanced techniques - e.g., source space analyses and measurements of network dynamics, as well as many behavioral, fMRI, TMS, and LFP studies. In essence, it is time to stop amassing binary results and start using single-trial analyses to build models of visual perception.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

124 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
63% Psychology
15% Agricultural and Biological Sciences
11% Neuroscience
by Academic Status
40% Student > Ph. D. Student
20% Researcher
7% Student > Master
by Country
3% United States
2% Netherlands
2% Germany

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in