Rethinking the boundaries and burdens of parental authority over education: a response to rob reich's case study of homeschooling

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rob Reich's claim that fruitful discussions about the balance among state, parental, and children's educational interests would benefit by contemplating the widespread phenomenon of homeschooling is a welcome suggestion. His policy recommendations, however, place an unjustified burden on parents to show the adequacy of homeschooling arrangements instead of placing the burden on the state to clarify commonly agreed-upon outcome measures. In this essay, Perry lanzer argues that Reich places the burden on parents by overstating the threat that the freedom given to homeschooling parents represents to the interests of liberal democratic states and children. Reich, Glanzer contends, also underestimates the state's tendency to use regulation to weaken the civil society essential for liberal democracy. To counter Reich's proposal, Glanzer offers recommendations regarding the proper limits of parental authority in education in general and in the case of homeschooling in particular.copy; 2008 Board of Trustees.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Glanzer, P. L. (2008). Rethinking the boundaries and burdens of parental authority over education: a response to rob reich’s case study of homeschooling. Educational Theory, 58(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00272.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free