How sensitive is physician performance to alternative compensation schedules? Evidence from a large network of primary care clinics.

25Citations
Citations of this article
2.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite its centrality for the provision of health care, physician compensation remains understudied, and existing studies either fail to control for time trends, cover small samples from highly particular settings, or examine empirically negligible changes in reward levels. Using a four-year sample of 59 physicians and 1.1 million encounters, we study how physicians at a network of primary care clinics responded when their salaried compensation plan was replaced with a lower salary plus substantial piece rates for encounters and select procedures. Although patient characteristics remained unchanged, physicians increased encounters by 11 to 61%, both by increasing encounters per day and days worked at the network, and increased procedures to the maximum reimbursable level. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Helmchen, L. A., & Lo Sasso, A. T. (2010). How sensitive is physician performance to alternative compensation schedules? Evidence from a large network of primary care clinics. Health Economics, 19(11), 1300–1317. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1551

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free