The theory has been misconstrued in four primary ways, which are often expressed as the claims of psychological reductionism, conceptual redundancy, biological reductionism, and hierarchy justification. This paper addresses these claims and suggests how social dominance theory builds on and moves beyond social identity theory and system justification theory.
CITATION STYLE
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. In Political Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 845–880). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.