"Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research": Correction to Frazier et al. (2004).

  • Frazier P
  • Tix A
  • Barron K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The goals of this article are to (a) describe differences between moderator and mediator effects; (b) provide nontechnical descriptions of how to examine each type of effect, including study design, analysis, and interpretation of results; (c) demonstrate how to analyze each type of effect; and (d) provide suggestions for further reading. The authors focus on the use of multiple regression because it is an accessible data-analytic technique contained in major statistical packages. When appropriate, they also note limitations of using regression to detect moderator and mediator effects and describe alternative procedures, particularly structural equation modeling. Finally, to illustrate areas of confusion in coun- seling psychology research, they review research testing moderation and mediation that was published in the Journal of Counseling Psychology during 2001.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research”: Correction to Frazier et al. (2004). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(2), 157–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.51.2.157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free