Why Do U. S. Firms Hold So Much than They Used To?

  • Bates T
  • Kahle K
  • Stulz R
ISSN: 00221082
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The average cash to assets ratio for U.S. industrial firms increases by 129% from 1980 to 2004. Because of this increase in the average cash ratio, American firms at the end of the sample period can pay back their debt obligations with their cash holdings, so that the average firm has no leverage when leverage is measured by net debt. This change in cash ratios and net debt is the result of a secular trend rather than the outcome of the recent buildup in cash holdings of some large firms. It is concentrated among firms that do not pay dividends. The average cash ratio increases over the sample period because the cash flow of American firms has become riskier, these firms hold fewer inventories and accounts receivable, and the typical firm spends more on R&D. The precautionary motive for cash holdings appears to explain the increase in the average cash ratio.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why Do U. S. Firms Hold So Much than They Used To? Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free