How were new medicines discovered?

1.5kCitations
Citations of this article
2.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Preclinical strategies that are used to identify potential drug candidates include target-based screening, phenotypic screening, modification of natural substances and biologic-based approaches. To investigate whether some strategies have been more successful than others in the discovery of new drugs, we analysed the discovery strategies and the molecular mechanism of action (MMOA) for new molecular entities and new biologics that were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration between 1999 and 2008. Out of the 259 agents that were approved, 75 were first-in-class drugs with new MMOAs, and out of these, 50 (67%) were small molecules and 25 (33%) were biologics. The results also show that the contribution of phenotypic screening to the discovery of first-in-class small-molecule drugs exceeded that of target-based approaches with 28 and 17 of these drugs coming from the two approaches, respectively in an era in which the major focus was on target-based approaches. We postulate that a target-centric approach for first-in-class drugs, without consideration of an optimal MMOA, may contribute to the current high attrition rates and low productivity in pharmaceutical research and development. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swinney, D. C., & Anthony, J. (2011). How were new medicines discovered? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10(7), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3480

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free