Within-session practice effect on paced auditory serial addition test in multiple sclerosis

8Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) is increasingly used in multiple sclerosis (MS) studies. Since these studies rely on repeated assessments with relatively short inter-test intervals, practice effects can be a confounding factor. We examined intra-session PASAT practice effects in 70 relapsing remitting (RR) and 40 secondary progressive (SP) patients. The average number of correct answers increased from 39.6 ± 11.7 in the first PASAT run to 43.8 ± 11.4 in the second run for the RR group, and from 39.1 ± 11.6 to 41.8 ± 13.3 in the SP group. PASAT scores showed a consistent decrease when comparing the second half of each test to the first half for both patient groups, and for both runs. Items for which the answer was a number greater than 9 had the same discrimination ability as other test items, but were significantly more difficult. A simulation of 'single-button' responses supported the use of the simplified scoring method which is currently used in fMRI studies. Our results demonstrate a within-session PASAT practice effect in MS, as well as a fatigability effect for both patient groups. © 2008 SAGE Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagels, G., D’Hooghe, M. B., Kos, D., Engelborghs, S., & De Deyn, P. P. (2008). Within-session practice effect on paced auditory serial addition test in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 14(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458507080062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free