Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The use of consensus as a factor of the margin of appreciation has been highly criticized for clashing with fundamental ideas of human rights theory. In this article I am going to address the main criticisms consensus receives and suggest a different use of this factor by human rights courts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bertelsen, S. (2017). Consensus and the Intensity of Judicial Review in the European Court of Human Rights. In Ius Gentium (Vol. 61, pp. 295–311). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55186-9_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free