Psychic vs. Economic Barriers to Vaccine Take-Up: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria

4Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper experimentally evaluates the relative importance of psychic costs of tetanus vaccination compared to monetary costs among women in rural Nigeria. We compare vaccine take-up between two conditions to receive cash incentives: clinic attendance vs. vaccine take-up. Because the only difference between these two conditions is whether a woman was required to receive a vaccine upon arrival at the clinic, the difference in clinic attendance between these two groups captures the psychic costs of vaccination. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find no evidence for significant psychic costs. Priming about disease severity increases the perceived severity of disease, but not vaccine take-up. Monetary costs strongly affect vaccination decisions.

References Powered by Scopus

Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial

951Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases

771Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What led to the Nigerian boycott of the polio vaccination campaign?

343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fear, knowledge, and vaccination behaviors among women in Northern Nigeria

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peer effects on vaccination behavior: Experimental evidence from rural Nigeria

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vaccine hesitancy and refusal: Behavioral evidence from rural northern Nigeria

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sato, R., & Takasaki, Y. (2019). Psychic vs. Economic Barriers to Vaccine Take-Up: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria. World Bank Economic Review, 33(3), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx025

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Researcher 5

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

41%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

29%

Social Sciences 3

18%

Engineering 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free