Psychic vs. Economic Barriers to Vaccine Take-Up: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria

3Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper experimentally evaluates the relative importance of psychic costs of tetanus vaccination compared to monetary costs among women in rural Nigeria. We compare vaccine take-up between two conditions to receive cash incentives: clinic attendance vs. vaccine take-up. Because the only difference between these two conditions is whether a woman was required to receive a vaccine upon arrival at the clinic, the difference in clinic attendance between these two groups captures the psychic costs of vaccination. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we find no evidence for significant psychic costs. Priming about disease severity increases the perceived severity of disease, but not vaccine take-up. Monetary costs strongly affect vaccination decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sato, R., & Takasaki, Y. (2019). Psychic vs. Economic Barriers to Vaccine Take-Up: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Nigeria. World Bank Economic Review, 33(3), 622–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhx025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free