Four Days, Forty Hours: A Case Study

11Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In instances where the four-day/forty-hour workweek was adopted, it was done so largely by businessmen who failed to look at the new schedule critically—only to find that there was little theoretical or practical justification for it in most cases. Alternatives to the 4/40 schedule include flexible hours, optimum work force mix, and job enrichment. © 1974, The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gannon, M. J. (1974). Four Days, Forty Hours: A Case Study. California Management Review, 17(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free