Revitalizing the Quantitative Understanding of the Digital Divide: An Uptake on the Digital Divide Indicators

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent advances in ICT research have uncovered several facts re-garding the nature of the digital divide. Following the renewed dimensions of the term, the need for universally accepted digital divide indicators has significantly heightened across the academic and policy discourses. Traditionally, researchers have subscribed to the belief that the digital divide is a mere separation between "have" and "have nots"; however, as the digital technology continues to experience innovation in the information age, digital divide is increasingly being understood as a multidimensional phenomena. The research to date has mostly focused on the qualitative rather than the quantitative nature of the digital divide. The few existent accounts of quantitative studies on the digital divide are often criticized for deploying unreliable data in their analysis. Inaccurate predictions significantly derail policymakers' abilities to form appropriate action plans in combating the digital divide. OECD and ITU have been hitting on front lines with their extensive research in ICT. This paper seeks to emphasize the quantitative understanding of the digital divide by reviewing the relevant literature and acknowledging the top indicators in the field. Apart from OECD and ITU, there is a general lack of research in determining the ICT indicators. Along with reviewing the relevant literature on latest ICT indicators, this study has documented twenty-nine significant ICT indicators and highlighted the need for future research into quantitative nature of the digital divide. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mubarak, F. (2014). Revitalizing the Quantitative Understanding of the Digital Divide: An Uptake on the Digital Divide Indicators. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 450 CCIS, pp. 120–130). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10211-5_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free