Dialogue Theory, Judicial Review, and Judicial Supremacy: A Comment on "Charter Dialogue Revisted"

Abstract

By suggesting that we view the judicial-legislative relationship as a dialogue, the· authors of" Charter Dialogue" have greatly influenced constitutional debate in Canada. This commentary offers three observations about the authors' latest contribution.First, it queries the continued usefulness of the term "dialogue." Second, it raises concerns with the idea that section 1 of the Charter promotes dialogue, as the term is now explained by the authors. Finally, it queries the authors' perspective on judicial review and their accompanying terminology.