Judicial treatment and pre-trial detention in a sample of arraignment hearings in Bogotá and Cali

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examines the correlates of judicial treatment and preliminary disposition of criminal cases in a random sample of cases in arraignment courts in Bogota and Cali (N = 330). We specify a set of multivariate models based on the direct observation of cases in these courts, including data on the behavior of judges, their decisions, and characteristics of suspects. We show variation in the treatment of suspects and their pre-trial detention status, related to "extra-legal" factors such as the type of defense and the racial or ethnic origin of suspects, as well as "legal" factors attached to the severity of the current offense and their prior criminal record.

References Powered by Scopus

The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing

245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of gender and race-ethnicity in the pretrial release process

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Distinguishing Race Effects on Pre-Trial Release and Sentencing Decisions

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Decision-making in an inquisitorial system: Lessons from Brazil

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pre-trial detention and legal defence in Latin America

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Criminal defense work in a sample of arrest hearings in three states of Mexico: the micro-dynamics of case-level engagement, influence, and strategy

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rengifo, A. F., Ávila, L., Gélvez, J. D., Ramírez, L., & Mora, P. (2019). Judicial treatment and pre-trial detention in a sample of arraignment hearings in Bogotá and Cali. Cuadernos de Economia (Colombia), 38(77), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v38n77.69450

Readers over time

‘20‘23‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

67%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 1

33%

Computer Science 1

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0