The role of phonology in a letter detection task

14Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated whether onsets and rimes have a role in the processing of written English. In both experiments, participants detected letter targets (e.g., t) in nonwords like vult faster than in nonwords like vust. This finding is consistent with Selkirk's (1982) view that sonorants (e.g., the /l/ of vult) cohere with preceding short vowels and are part of the vowel nucleus. In contrast, the /t/ of vust is part of the syllable's coda st and so is harder to isolate. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the time required for one to detect single-member codas following vowel digraphs (e.g., the t in veet) was similar to the time to detect the same target letter following a postvocalic sonorant (e.g., the t in vult). No evidence was found for onsets. The results provide support for a phonological organization among letters of printed rimes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gross, J., Treiman, R., & Inman, J. (2000). The role of phonology in a letter detection task. Memory and Cognition, 28(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198550

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free