An interventional approach to block brain damage caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection, by use of a combination of phosphodiesterase inhibitors

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We tested the combination of phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3 and PDE4 inhibitors as an interventional approach to prevent the development of brain damage after Shiga toxin (Stx)-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection, using mice with protein calorie malnutrition. The combination consisted of pentoxifylline and rolipram; the dose of each inhibitor was 7.5 mg/kg. Treatment with this combination, which was administered intraperitoneally twice daily at 12-h intervals, increased serum concentrations of each inhibitor to >2 μg/mL and afforded significant levels of protection when it was continued for 3 days, starting on day 2 (95% survival rate; P < .001) or day 3 (63% survival rate; P < .01) of infection. The treatment reduced plasma levels of Stx2; consequently, immunoreactions of Stx2 were not found in the brain, and survivors did not show neurologic symptoms. Protection was associated with decreased levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and increased production of interleukin-10 in serum, the brain, and the cecum. Although the combination at doses >2 μg/ mL reduced Gb3 content of and Stx2 binding to Caco-2 cells, its ability to suppress production of TNF-α seemed to be more important for the decrease in cell-bound Stx2 in intestinal epithelial cells. Therefore, the combination of PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitors might be used as an interventional approach to prevent brain damage caused by STEC infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Okayama, A., Mikasa, K., Matsui, N., Higashi, N., Miyamoto, M., & Kita, E. (2004). An interventional approach to block brain damage caused by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection, by use of a combination of phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 190(12), 2129–2136. https://doi.org/10.1086/425982

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free