Head and neck 192Ir HDR-brachytherapy dosimetry using a grid-based Boltzmann solver

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare dosimetry for head and neck cancer patients, calculated with TG-43 formalism and a commercially available grid-based Boltzmann solver. Material and methods: This study included 3D-dosimetry of 49 consecutive brachytherapy head and neck cancer patients, computed by a grid-based Boltzmann solver that takes into account tissue inhomogeneities as well as TG-43 formalism. 3D-treatment planning was carried out by using computed tomography. Results: Dosimetric indices D90 and V100 for target volume were about 3% lower (median value) for the grid-based Boltzmann solver relative to TG-43-based computation (p < 0.01). The V150 dose parameter showed 1.6% increase from grid-based Boltzmann solver to TG-43 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Dose differences between results of a grid-based Boltzmann solver and TG-43 formalism for highdose- rate head and neck brachytherapy patients to the target volume were found. Distinctions in D90 of CTV were low (2.63 Gy for grid-based Boltzmann solver vs. 2.71 Gy TG-43 in mean). In our clinical practice, prescription doses remain unchanged for high-dose-rate head and neck brachytherapy for the time being. © 2014 Termedia Sp. z o.o.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siebert, F. A., Wolf, S., & Kóvacs, G. (2013). Head and neck 192Ir HDR-brachytherapy dosimetry using a grid-based Boltzmann solver. Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy, 5(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.39444

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free