Redrawing the boundary of "speech community": How and why the historicity and materiality of language and the space/place distinction matter to its reconceptualization

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay contemplates how we adapt existing sociolinguistic theoretical concepts, methodologies, and analytical units to the world we live in today. Regardless of one's location on the globe, our lives are profoundly affected by increasingly intense global interconnections and, at the same time, equally intense differentiation of space attending late global capitalism and the evolving nation-state system. While sociolinguistics has attended the heterogeneity within the speech community, in the world today as such, the idea of speech community as bounded is no longer tenable. In envisioning the future direction of IJSL and its leadership in the field, this essay suggests that speech community as an analytical concept would be significantly advanced through the theoretical integration of the space/place distinction and the historicity and materiality of language into its architectonics. By drawing on some of the recent works for guiding models, the essay argues that the reconceptualization of speech community would also demand radical openness to interdisciplinary approaches.

References Powered by Scopus

Spatialities of globalisation

870Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

LOOKING LIKE A LANGUAGE, SOUNDING LIKE A RACE: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and the Learning of Latinidad

416Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life

257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Inoue, M. (2021). Redrawing the boundary of “speech community”: How and why the historicity and materiality of language and the space/place distinction matter to its reconceptualization. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267–268), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0079

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Researcher 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 3

38%

Social Sciences 2

25%

Linguistics 2

25%

Computer Science 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free