STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ‘SUCCESS’: A BIOLOGY STUDENT RETENTION PROGRAM

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is no secret that the retention of students majoring in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) has presented itself to be a challenge across the country. The National Science Foundation (NSF) allots substantial funding annually towards this effort. Jackson State University’s (JSU) Students Understanding Chemistry Concepts to Enhance STEM Skills (SUCCESS) Program is one such effort funded by the NSF. While the JSU Department of Biology had over 900 majors in 2016, data suggested that less than 23% would graduate with a bachelor’s degree within six years of entry. According to data obtained, the first four chemistry courses, General Chemistry (I & II) and Organic Chemistry (I & II), were significant barriers to the educational success of many Biology majors. A review of the literature provides many examples of initiatives to improve student retention. A reoccurring theme found that the comprehensive understanding of the students’ experiences within a particular major is essential to determining how best to impact student retention in that department. Student focus groups were implemented to evaluate the perceptions of Biology majors enrolled in Chemistry classes who utilized the SUCCESS Program. The overall impression of students in the SUCCESS Program was that it was helpful and beneficial to their classroom success, increased their confidence to learn Chemistry, and improved their understanding of Chemistry concepts. The students often identified scheduling conflicts as a hindrance to their participation. They also felt that the program was needed to help most students pass their tests.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Howard, B. L., Turner, T., Campbell, N., Graham, B., Garner, S., & Hamme, A. (2021). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ‘SUCCESS’: A BIOLOGY STUDENT RETENTION PROGRAM. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, 57(4), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.34107/KSZV7781.10392

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free