Dupla artéria torácica esqueletizada versus convencional na revascularização do miocárdio sem CEC em diabéticos

  • Milani R
  • Brofman P
  • Guimarães M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the influence of the technique used in the dissection of thoracic arteries in the evolution of diabetic patients submitted to OPCAB. Methods: Seventy diabetic patients submitted to OPCAB using bilateral thoracic arteries were evaluated. In Group A, thoracic arteries were dissected as a pedicle, while in Group B they were skeletonized. Results: The mean age of patient sin Group A was 52.14 ± 7.35 years old versus 55.71 ± 8.1 years for Group B (p=0.057). In Group A, six patients (17.1%) were insulin dependent against nine (25.7%) in Group B (p = 0.561). The EUROSCORE was 3.97 ± 2.49 for Group Aopposed to 4.14 ± 3.06 for Group B (p = 0.879). The number of distal anastomoses in Group A was 3 ± 0.77 versus 3.03 ± 0.89 in Group B (p = 0.981). Three patients (8.57%) from Group A presented with mediastinitis. Insulin dependence was the only significant risk factor (p=0.008) for mediastinitis. In this group the use of skeletonized ITAs significantly decreased the incidence of mediastinitis (p = 0.044). Conclusion: The incidence of mediastinitis was lower in the group for which thoracic arteries were dissected using skeletonization. Among insulin-dependent diabetics, 50% of the patients from the group in which the pedicled internal thoracic artery was utilized presented with mediastinitis; the utilization of skeletonized ITAs significantly decreases the incidence of mediastinitis. Descriptors: Myocardial revascularization. Thoracic arteries. Diabetes mellitus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milani, R., Brofman, P. R., Guimarães, M., Barboza, L., Tchaick, R. M., Meister Filho, H., … Maia, F. (2008). Dupla artéria torácica esqueletizada versus convencional na revascularização do miocárdio sem CEC em diabéticos. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, 23(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-76382008000300011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free