Clinical application of machine learning and computer vision to indocyanine green quantification for dynamic intraoperative tissue characterisation: how to do it

13Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Indocyanine green (ICG) quantification and assessment by machine learning (ML) could discriminate tissue types through perfusion characterisation, including delineation of malignancy. Here, we detail the important challenges overcome before effective clinical validation of such capability in a prospective patient series of quantitative fluorescence angiograms regarding primary and secondary colorectal neoplasia. Methods: ICG perfusion videos from 50 patients (37 with benign (13) and malignant (24) rectal tumours and 13 with colorectal liver metastases) of between 2- and 15-min duration following intravenously administered ICG were formally studied (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04220242). Video quality with respect to interpretative ML reliability was studied observing practical, technical and technological aspects of fluorescence signal acquisition. Investigated parameters included ICG dosing and administration, distance–intensity fluorescent signal variation, tissue and camera movement (including real-time camera tracking) as well as sampling issues with user-selected digital tissue biopsy. Attenuating strategies for the identified problems were developed, applied and evaluated. ML methods to classify extracted data, including datasets with interrupted time-series lengths with inference simulated data were also evaluated. Results: Definable, remediable challenges arose across both rectal and liver cohorts. Varying ICG dose by tissue type was identified as an important feature of real-time fluorescence quantification. Multi-region sampling within a lesion mitigated representation issues whilst distance–intensity relationships, as well as movement-instability issues, were demonstrated and ameliorated with post-processing techniques including normalisation and smoothing of extracted time–fluorescence curves. ML methods (automated feature extraction and classification) enabled ML algorithms glean excellent pathological categorisation results (AUC-ROC > 0.9, 37 rectal lesions) with imputation proving a robust method of compensation for interrupted time-series data with duration discrepancies. Conclusion: Purposeful clinical and data-processing protocols enable powerful pathological characterisation with existing clinical systems. Video analysis as shown can inform iterative and definitive clinical validation studies on how to close the translation gap between research applications and real-world, real-time clinical utility.

References Powered by Scopus

Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies

2397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): A multi-institutional study

441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consensus Guidelines for the Use of Fluorescence Imaging in Hepatobiliary Surgery

177Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Fluorescent Probes for Imaging in Humans: Where Are We Now?

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Real-time administration of indocyanine green in combination with computer vision and artificial intelligence for the identification and delineation of colorectal liver metastases

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Indocyanine Green (ICG) and Colorectal Surgery: A Literature Review on Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Usage

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardy, N. P., MacAonghusa, P., Dalli, J., Gallagher, G., Epperlein, J. P., Shields, C., … Cahill, R. A. (2023). Clinical application of machine learning and computer vision to indocyanine green quantification for dynamic intraoperative tissue characterisation: how to do it. Surgical Endoscopy, 37(8), 6361–6370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09963-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

30%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

50%

Social Sciences 3

30%

Environmental Science 1

10%

Computer Science 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free