Punishing Mothers for Men’s Violence: Failure to Protect Legislation and the Criminalisation of Abused Women

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article explores the gender dynamics of ‘causing or allowing a child to die’, contrary to the Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, section 5. This offence was intended to allow for prosecution where a child had been killed and it was uncertain who had killed him/her, but also to allow for prosecution of non-violent defendants who failed to protect him/her. More women than men have been charged and convicted of this offence signifying a reversal of usual patterns of prosecution and conviction. This analysis interrogates how section 5 criminalises women who have experienced domestic abuse. Drawing on a case observation, reported cases and media reports of cases, I suggest this offence derives from and perpetuates patriarchal constructs of motherhood. Grounded in a feminist approach building on women’s concrete experiences of law, I conclude that section 5 should be amended so that it is only used where it cannot be ascertained which defendant actively harmed a child.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Singh, S. (2021). Punishing Mothers for Men’s Violence: Failure to Protect Legislation and the Criminalisation of Abused Women. Feminist Legal Studies, 29(2), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-021-09455-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free