Cardiopulmonary bypass and activation of antithrombotic plasma protein C

29Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: We hypothesized that antithrombotic plasma-activated protein C plays a defensive antithrombotic role during coronary ischemia and postischemic reperfusion. Methods and results: We evaluated protein C activation during cardiopulmonary bypass and coronary reperfusion in 20 patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. During cardiopulmonary bypass and during the 10 minutes after aortic unclamping, the plasma levels of protein C (mean ± standard error of the mean) decreased from 123% ± 7% to 74% ± 5% of normal mean. In contrast, the levels of activated protein C in plasma increased from 122% ± 8% to 159% ± 21%, and the activated protein C/protein C ratio increased from 1.04 ± 0.08 to 2.29 ± 0.31 (P = .006, 2- tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test). Patients were stratified on the basis of the increase in activated protein C in the coronary sinus plasma at 10 minutes after reperfusion by means of the arbitrary value of 1.5 for the activated protein C/protein C ratio. Within 24 hours, the patients with low increases in activated protein C (ratio < 1.5, n = 8) had a significantly (P 1.5). The rapid increase in activated protein C during the first 10 minutes after aortic unclamping indicated protein C activation in the reperfused vascular beds. Conclusions: the antithrombotic protein C pathway was significantly activated during cardiopulmonary bypass mainly during the minutes after aortic unclamping in the ischemic vascular beds. Suboptimal protein C activation during ischemia may impair the postischemic recovery of human heart and circulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petaja, J., Pesonen, E., Fernandez, J. A., Vento, A. E., Ramo, O. J., Griffin, J. H., … Stern, D. M. (1999). Cardiopulmonary bypass and activation of antithrombotic plasma protein C. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 118(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70178-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free