HR-pQCT imaging in children, adolescents and young adults: Systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis of normative data

13Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We aimed to investigate the methodologies on image acquisition of normative data of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in children, adolescents and/or young adults (up to 25 years) and to determine their normative data based on available literature. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science from 1947 to July 2019. Quality of articles was assessed using Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) scoring system and Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Articles which fitted the following criteria were combined to meta-analysis: age range (15 to 22.6 years), references at tibia (22.5mm) and/or radius (9.0 to 9.5mm). Eight articles were ultimately included in the systematic review and 4 of them that filled the criteria were summarised in meta-analysis. The results of random effects model of HR-pQCT parameters of the 4 articles were as follows: 1)Radius: bone volume fraction (BT/BV) [estimate 0.17:0.1229(lower)-0.2115 (upper); trabecular number (Tb_N):2.08(2.03–2.12); trabecular thickness (Tb.Th):0.07 (0.07–0.0.08); trabecular separation (Tb.Sp):0.41 (0.38–0.42); cortical thickness (Ct.Th):0.85 (0.76–0.94); cortical porosity (Ct.Po):1.53 (0.63–2.44); total area (Tt.Ar):263.66(-385.3–912.6); total bone density (Tt-vBMD):280.5 (73.1–487.7); Trabecular density (Tb-vBMD):223.6 (47.1–400.09), and cortical density (CT.vBMD):765.9(389.1–1142.8). 2)Tibia: BT/BV:0.18 (0.17–0.19); Tb_N:2.02 (1.83–2.2); Tb.Th:0.08 (0.80–0.09); Tb.Sp:0.40(0.36–0.44); Ct.Th:1.32(1.26–1.38); Ct.Po:3.15 (1.1–5.2); Tt.Ar:693.1(150.2–1235.8); Tt-vBMD:343.76 (335.5–352.1); Tb-vBMD:223.6 (213.37 (193.5–233.2), and CT.vBMD:894.3 (857.6–931.1). There is overall ‘fair’ evidence on reporting of results of normative data of HR-pQCT parameters in children, adolescents and/or young adults. However, data are scarce pointing out to the urgent need for standardization of acquisition parameters and guidelines on the use of HR-PQCT in these populations.

References Powered by Scopus

Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

10217Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

9606Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration

5212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Impact of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Skeletal Integrity and Strength in Adolescents as Assessed by HRpQCT

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography: research or clinical practice?

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in the emergency setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mata-Mbemba, D., Rohringer, T., Ibrahim, A., Adams-Webberc, T., Moineddin, R., Doria, A. S., & Vali, R. (2019). HR-pQCT imaging in children, adolescents and young adults: Systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis of normative data. PLoS ONE, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225663

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

60%

Researcher 4

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

53%

Engineering 3

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 3

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free