Outage, throughput and energy efficiency analysis of some half and full duplex cooperative relaying schemes

17Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we compare cooperative full-duplex (FD) and incremental cooperative half-duplex (HD) relaying, in terms of outage probability, throughput and energy efficiency. We consider a practical model for the FD relay, where self-interference between transmitted and received signals is taken into account. The FD transmission is based on the well-known block Markov encoding scheme. For the HD transmission, incremental space-time cooperation and selection combining based on the cooperative decode-and-forward protocol are considered. Our results show that incremental cooperative HD relaying can outperform cooperative FD relaying, specially if the self-interference is non-negligible, achieving a better trade-off between throughput and energy consumption.

References Powered by Scopus

Elements of Information Theory

36756Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior

11157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Capacity Theorems for the Relay Channel

3386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On rate region analysis of half- and full-duplex OFDM communication links

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survey on cooperative strategies for wireless relay channels

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance analysis of full duplex decode-and-forward cooperative relaying over Nakagami-m fading channels

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alves, H., Souza, R. D., & Fraidenraich, G. (2014). Outage, throughput and energy efficiency analysis of some half and full duplex cooperative relaying schemes. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 25(11), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.2658

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 3

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free