Non-Western small states: activists or survivors?

  • Gibert M
  • Grzelczyk V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

AbstractIn this introduction to the collection, we explain its focus on non-Western small states. While the terms ?non-Western? and ?small states? are problematic ? we discuss these problems here ? the smallness and non-Westerness of the states studied by the contributing authors set them apart in a way that has attracted little academic attention so far. They allow them to operate with fewer normative and practical constraints than their bigger, Western counterparts; offer them a wide range of (often historically forged) political ties; and force them to draw on a diversity of approaches and strategic thinking, and a creativity, that they are too rarely credited for. Non-Western small states, rather than being mere survivors constrained to the world?s periphery, are better understood as activist states intent on existing. The collection offers a range of analytical keys to make sense of these states and their role in the international scene.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibert, M. V., & Grzelczyk, V. (2016). Non-Western small states: activists or survivors? Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1231012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free