Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of 2 Pyrazinamide Formulations in Healthy Chinese Adults: A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized-Sequence, 2×2 Crossover Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A single-dose, open-label, randomized-sequence, 2×2 crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese adults, after fasting and postprandial, to evaluate the bioequivalence of 2 pyrazinamide (PZA) formulations. Fasting and postprandial tests were conducted in 24 cases. Test-reference and reference-test were randomly divided into 2 sequence groups, with 12 cases in each group. The concentration of PZA in plasma was determined after 0.5 g single oral PZA test and reference formulations by the high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method. In the fasting group, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the 2 formulations maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 to last detectable plasma concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity after logarithmic conversion were 104.8% to 121.9%, 97.7% to 101.6%, and 97.7% to 101.6%, respectively. In the postprandial group, the 90%CIs of the 2 formulations’ Cmax, AUC from time 0 to last detectable plasma concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity after logarithmic conversion were 86.4% to 100.2%, 96% to 102%, 95.8% to 102.3%, respectively. The 90%CIs of the test/reference Cmax ratio and AUC ratio were within the acceptable range of 80.00% to 125.00% for bioequivalence under both fasting and postprandial conditions. No serious adverse events occurred during treatment with the test formulation or the reference formulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, S., Ren, J., Wang, H., Zhi, T., Zhu, Y., Feng, J., … Zhang, R. (2022). Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of 2 Pyrazinamide Formulations in Healthy Chinese Adults: A Single-Dose, Open-Label, Randomized-Sequence, 2×2 Crossover Study. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development, 11(4), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free