Prediction of construction litigation outcome - A case-based reasoning approach

13Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since construction claims are normally affected by a large number of complex and interrelated factors, it will be advantageous to the parties to a dispute to know with some certainty how the case would be resolved if it were taken to court. The application of recent artificial intelligence technologies can be cost-effective in this problem domain. In this paper, a case-based reasoning (CBR) approach is adopted to predict the outcome of construction claims, on the basis of characteristics of cases and the corresponding past court decisions. The approach is demonstrated to be feasible and effective by predicting the outcome of construction claims in Hong Kong in the last 10 years. The results show that the CBR system is able to give a successful prediction rate higher than 80%. With this, the parties would be more prudent in pursuing litigation and hence the number of disputes could be reduced significantly. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chau, K. W. (2006). Prediction of construction litigation outcome - A case-based reasoning approach. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4031 LNAI, pp. 548–553). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11779568_59

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free